Radiography Testing

A variety of NDT techniques are available for detection and characterisation of defects in welds. All NDT techniques are based on physical principles. Nearly every form of energy is used as probing medium in NDT. Likewise nearly every property of the materials to be inspected has been made the basis for some method or technique of NDT. In general, NDT methods involve subjecting the material (being examined) to some form of external energy source (X-rays, ultrasonic, thermal wave, electromagnetic fields etc.) and analysing the detected response signals (refracted energy, induced voltage and diffracted energy).

Inspection of welds

The beam of radiation must be directed to the middle of the section under examination and must be normal to the material surface at that point, except in special techniques where known defects are best revealed by a different alignment of the beam. The length of weld under examination for each exposure shall be such that the thickness of the material at the diagnostic extremities, measured in the direction of the incident beam, does not exceed the actual thickness at that point by more than 6%. The specimen to be inspected is placed between the source of radiation and the detecting device, usually the film in a light tight holder or cassette, and the radiation is allowed to penetrate the part for the required length of time to be adequately recorded.

The result is a two-dimensional projection of the part onto the film, producing a latent image of varying densities according to the amount of radiation reaching each area. It is known as a radiograph, as distinct from a photograph produced by light. Because film is cumulative in its response (the exposure increasing as it absorbs more radiation), relatively weak radiation can be detected by prolonging the exposure until the film can record an image that will be visible after development. The radiograph is examined as a negative, without printing as a positive as in photography. This is because, in printing, some of the detail is always lost and no useful purpose is served.

Before commencing a radiographic examination, it is always advisable to examine the component with one's own eyes, to eliminate any possible external defects. If the surface of a weld is too irregular, it may be desirable to grind it to obtain a smooth finish, but this is likely to be limited to those cases in which the surface irregularities (which will be visible on the radiograph) may make detecting internal defects difficult.

After this visual examination, the operator will have a clear idea of the possibilities of access to the two faces of the weld, which is important both for the setting up of the equipment and for the choice of the most appropriate technique.

Defects such as delaminations and planar cracks are difficult to detect using radiography, which is why penetrants are often used to enhance the contrast in the detection of such defects. Penetrants used include silver nitrate, zinc iodide, chloroform and diiodomethane. Choice of the penetrant is determined by the ease with which it can penetrate the cracks and also with which it can be removed. Diiodomethane has the advantages of high opacity, ease of penetration, and ease of removal because it evaporates relatively quickly. However, it can cause skin burns.

RADIOGRAPHY
As the X-ray absorption coefficient depends strongly on material density, radiography is particularly effective at detecting volumetric defects, which contain either extra mass or missing mass (such as slag inclusions or porosity). The benchmark for radiographic inspection of welds is still high-quality film radiography and good radiographic practice is now enshrined by a series of national standards, covering factors such as choice of voltage, film–source distances, intensifiers, image quality indicators, film density, film processing, etc. There have been a number of advances in radiography over the past 10–15 years including more reliable microfocus tubes, real-time radiography and the application of image processing techniques to sharpen the image and to increase the contrast. For better definition of defects and delectability of small defects like micro-cracks in thin components and complex geometries, high resolution micro-focal X radiography has an edge over the conventional radiography. One of the important applications of micro-focal radiography is evaluation of tube to tube sheet weld joints of PFBR steam generators (made by welding between pull out of tube sheet and the tube).

The most significant recent development in radiography has been the real-time radiography. Real time radiography or fluoroscopy differs from conventional radiography in that the X ray image is observed on a fluorescent screen rather than recorded on a film. Fluoroscopy has the advantages of high speed and low cost of inspection. Present day real time systems use image intensifiers, video camera and monitor. The principal advantages of real-time radiography are that it is well suited to automation and the images of the component under inspection are available directly without time delays due to film exposure and processing. Furthermore, as the images are provided in digital form, image processing and automatic defect interpretation softwares can be readily incorporated into the inspection system. On-line monitoring of welding is another possibility by real time radiography. Direct examination of the welds in real time saves films and time and is found to be cost effective in the long run [5]. The use of microfocal units in conjunction with image intensifying system greatly enhances the versatility and sensitivity of the real time radiography, by way of zooming or projection magnification.

With the advent of image processing systems, the sensitivity that can be achieved is comparable to film sensitivity. The stored or digitized X-ray image can be subjected to image processing and enhancement techniques such as contrast stretching, edge enhancement, special filtering, differentiation, averaging, and pattern recognition for enhanced detection of defects and also for obtaining quantitative information. The versatility of image processing is that this can be performed in real time as well as on film images. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show typical radiograph of a weld joint. Figure 1(a) gives the raw image wherein penetrameter wires are not clearly seen. After contrast stretching and image enhancement (Fig. 1(b)), the lack of penetration can be seen and the wire penetrameters can be identified thereby increasing the sensitivity.

» Read More...

What Factors affecting distortion ?

The temperature distribution in the weldment is therefore nonuniform. Normally, the weld metal and the heat affected zone (HAZ) are at temperatures substantially above that of the unaffected base metal. Upon cooling, the weld pool solidifies and shrinks, exerting stresses on the surrounding weld metal and HAZ.

If the stresses produced from thermal expansion and contraction exceed the yield strength of the parent metal, localized plastic deformation of the metal occurs. Plastic deformation results in lasting change in the component dimensions and distorts the structure. This causes distortion of weldments.

Several types of distortion are listed below:
* Longitudinal shrinkage
* Transverse shrinkage
* Angular distortion
* Bowing
* Buckling
* Twisting

Some of the factors affecting the distortion are listed below:
* Amount of restraint
* Welding procedure
* Parent metal properties
* Weld joint design
* Part fit up

Restraint can be used to minimize distortion. Components welded without any external restraint are free to move or distort in response to stresses from welding. It is not unusual for many shops to clamp or restrain components to be welded in some manner to prevent movement and distortion. This restraint does result in higher residual stresses in the components.

Welding procedure impacts the amount of distortion primarily due to the amount of the heat input produced. The welder has little control on the heat input specified in a welding procedure. This does not prevent the welder from trying to minimize distortion. While the welder needs to provide adequate weld metal, the welder should not needlessly increase the total weld metal volume added to a weldment.

Parent metal properties, which have an effect on distortion, are coefficient of thermal expansion and specific heat of the material. The coefficient of thermal expansion of the metal affects the degree of thermal expansion and contraction and the associated stresses that result from the welding process. This in turn determines the amount of distortion in a component.

Weld joint design will effect the amount of distortion in a weldment. Both butt and fillet joints may experience distortion. However, distortion is easier to minimize in butt joints.

Part fit up should be consistent to fabricate foreseeable and uniform shrinkage. Weld joints should be adequately and consistently tacked to minimize movement between the parts being joined by welding.

» Read More...

Gamma Radiography Testing

non destructive testType of operation.
Static - development may be mechanized.

Equipment.
Radioactive isotope in storage container. Remote handling gear. Lightproof cassette. Photographic development facilities. Darkroom and illuminator for assessment.

Mode of operation.
Gamma rays, similar to X-rays but of shorter wavelength, are emitted continuously from the isotope. It cannot be ‘switched off’ so when not in use, it is kept in a heavy storage container that absorbs radiation. They pass through the work to be inspected. Parts of the work presenting less obstruction to gamma rays, such as cavities or inclusions, allow increased exposure of the film. The film is developed to form a radiograph with cavities or inclusions indicated by darker images. Section thickness increases (such as weld) appear as less dense images.

Operating parameters.
Wavelength of radiation : 0.001 - 0.015 nm
0.01 - 1 nm (1.25MeV - 80KeV)
Portability : good (except for container)
Access : good
Exposure time : 1 second - 24 hours
Thickness range : up to 250 mm
Minimum defect size : 1% of thickness

Materials.
Most weldable materials can be inspected.


Typical welding applications.
Site inspection.
Panoramic exposure for small work.

Advantages, limitations, consumables and safety as for X-ray radiograph


X-ray Radiography.

Type of operation.
Static or transportable.


Equipment.
X-ray tube. Stand and control gear. Lightproof cassette. Photographic development facilities. Dark room and illumination for assessment.


Mode of operation.
X-rays are emitted from the tube and pass through the work to be inspected. Parts of the work presenting less obstruction to X-rays, such as cavities or inclusions, allow increased exposure of the film. The film is developed to form a radiograph with cavities or inclusions indicated by darker images. Section thickness increases (such as weld under-bead) appear as less dense images.

Operating parameters.
Tube voltage : 10 - 500 kV
Tube current : 10 - 250 mA
Power consumption : 1 - 10 kW
Portability : fair
Access : fair
Exposure time : 1 sec - 10 min
Thickness range : up to 100 mm
Minimum defect size : 0.1% of thickness X 0.05 mm

Materials.
Most weldable materials may be inspected.

Typical welding applications.
Pipelines
Pressure vessels.

Overall advantages.
Accurate pictorial presentation of results.
Radiographs may be kept as a permanent record.
Not confined to welds.

Overall limitations.
Personnel must be clear of area during exposure.
Cracks parallel to film may not show up.
Film expensive.

Consumables.
Film.
Processing chemicals.
Water.
Isotope replacements - for gamma radiograph

Safety
Cumulative radiation risk to personnel requires stringent precautions.

» Read More...

Portable Steel Hardness Tester-20-65 HRC

non destructive test

Flexbar Portable Steel Hardness Tester (complete kit). Range of 20 to 65 HRC (equivalent Rockwell C Scale). Accuracy of °1.5 Points. Complete kit includes a hand-held impact indenter, an illuminated 60X measuring microscope, batteries, test block, hardness conversion calculator, instructions, and carrying case. A hand-held impact indenter drives a 1/16" diameter carbide ball into the sample with a calibrated impact. The impression diameter is read directly with a microscope containing a calibrated reticle.

» Read More...

Duties of a Welding Inspector

It is the Duty of a welding inspector to ensure that all operations concerning welding are carried out in strict according with written, or agreed practices, or specifications.
This will include monitoring or checking a number of operation including:

Before Welding
Safety:
Ensure that all operations are carried out in complete complience with local company, or National safety legislation(i.e. permits to work are in place).

Documentation
Specification (Year and revision)
Drawing (Correct revisions)
Welding procedure specification and welder approvals
Calibration certification (Welding equipment/ancillaries and all inspection instrument)
Material and cionsumable certification

Welding Process and Ancillaries
Welding equipment and all related ancillaries (Cable, regulator, ovens, quivers, etc)

Incoming Consumable
All pipe/plate and welding consumable for size, type and condition.

Marking out preparation and set up:
Correct nethod of cutting weld prepararions (pre heat for thermal cutting if applicable)
Correct preparation (Relevant bevel angles, root face, root gabe, root radius, land, etc)
Correct pre-welding distortion control (Tacking, bridging, jigs, line up clamps, etc)
Correct pre heat applied prior to tack welding
All tack to be monitored and inspected.

During Welding
Pre-heat values (Heating methode, location and control)
In-process distortion control (Squence or balanced welding)
Consumable control (Specification, size, condition, and any special treatment)
Process type and all related variable parameters (Voltage, amperege, travel speed)
Purging gases (Type, pressure/flow and control methode)
Wedling condition for root run/hot pass and all subsequent run, and inter0run ceaning)
Minimum, or maximum inter-pass temperature (Temperature and controling methode)
Complience with all other variables sated on the approved welding procedure

After Welding
Visual inspection of the welded joint (including dimensional aspects)
NDT requirements (Methode and qualification of operator, and excecution)
Identify repairs from assesment of visual or and NDT reports (Refer to repair below)
Post weld heat treatment (PWHT) (Heating method and temperature recording system)
Re-inspect with visual/NDT after PWHT (if applicable)
Hydrostatic test procedures (For pipelines or pressure vessels)

Repairs
Excavation procedure (Approval and execution)
Approval of NDT procedures (For assessment of complete defect removal)
Repair procedure (Approval or re-welding procedures and welder approval)
Execution of approved re-welding procedure (Complience with repair procedure)
Re-inspect the repair area with visual inspection and approved NDT methode.

Submission of inspection reports, and all related documents to the Q/C departement.

» Read More...

Aerospace NDT

The field of NDT is varied, there are various Non destructive Testing (NDT) methods used for inspection of aircraft, powerplant, and components in aircraft. The effectiveness of any particular method of NDT depends upon the skill, experience, and training of the person(s) performing the inspection process. Each process is limited in its usefulness by its adaptability to the particular component to be inspected.

The product manufacturer or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) generally specifies the particular NDT method and procedure to be used in inspection. These NDT requirements will be specified in the manufacturer's inspection, maintenance, or overhaul manual; FAA Airworthiness Directives (AD); Supplemental Structural Inspection Documents (SSID); or manufacturer's service bulletins (SB). However, in some conditions an alternate NDT method and procedure can be used. This includes procedures and data developed by FAA certificated repair stations under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR part 145.

Title 14 CFR part 43 requires that all maintenance be performed using methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the current manufacturer's maintenance manual or instructions for continued airworthiness prepared by its manufacturer. If the maintenance instructions include materials, parts, tools, equipment, or test apparatus necessary to comply with industry practices then those items are required to be available and used as per part 43.

NDT levels.

Air Transport Association (ATA) Specification 105 provides guidelines For Training and Qualifying Personnel In Non destructive Testing Methods.

a. Level i Special.
Initial classroom hours and on-the-job training shall be sufficient to qualify an individual for certification for a specific task. The individual must be able to pass a vision and color perception examination, a general exam dealing with standards and NDT procedures, and a practical exam conducted by a qualified Level II or Level III certificated person.
b. Level i/Level ii.
The individual shall have an FAA Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic Certificate, complete the required number of formal classroom hours, and complete an examination.
c. Level iii.
(1) The individual must have graduated from a 4 year college or university with a degree in engineering or science, plus 1 year of minimum experience in NDT in an assignment comparable to that of a Level II in the applicable NDT methods: or
(2) The individual must have 2 years of engineering or science study at a university, college, or technical school, plus 2 years of experience as a Level ii in the applicable NDT methods: or
(3) The individual must have 4 years of experience working as a Level ii in the applicable NDT methods and complete an examination.

The success of any aerospace NDT methods and procedures depends upon the knowledge, skill, and experience of the aerospace NDT personnel involved. The person(s) responsible for detecting and interpreting indications, such as eddy current, X-ray, or ultrasonic NDT, must be qualified and certified to specific FAA, or other acceptable government or industry standards, such as MIL-STD-410, Non destructive Testing Personnel Qualification and Certification, or Air Transport Association (ATA) Specification 105 Guidelines for Training and Qualifying Personnel in Non destructive Testing Methods. The person should be familiar with the test method, know the potential types of discontinuities peculiar to the material, and be familiar with their effect on the structural integrity of the part.
Eddy current inspection detects flaws in conductive materials.

Magnetic particle inspection is for flaw detection in ferromagnetic materials.
Dye penetrant inspection or liquid penetrant inspection LPI locates surface-breaking cracks or defects in all non-porous materials whcih might be, for example, fatigue.

Flaw detection and processes.

Inspection personnel should know where flaws occur or can be expected to exist and what effect they can have in each of the aerospace NDT test methods. Misinterpretation and/or improper evaluation of flaws or improper performance of aerospace NDT can result in serviceable parts being rejected and defective parts being accepted.
All NDT personnel should be familiar with the detection of flaws such as: corrosion, inherent flaws, primary processing flaws, secondary processing or finishing flaws, and in-service flaws. The following paragraphs classify and discuss the types of flaws or anomalies that may be detected by aerospace NDT.

a. Corrosion detection. This is the electrochemical deterioration of a metal resulting from chemical reaction with the surrounding environment. Corrosion is very common and can be an extremely critical defect. Therefore, NDT personnel may devote a significant amount of their inspection time to corrosion detection.

b. Inherent Flaws. This group of flaws is present in metal as the result of its initial solidification from the molten state, before any of the operations to forge or roll it into useful sizes and shapes have begun. The following are brief descriptions of some inherent flaws.

Primary pipe is a shrinkage cavity that forms at the top of an ingot during metal solidification, which can extend deep into the ingot. Failure to cut away all of the ingot shrinkage cavity can result in unsound metal. called pipe, that shows up as irregular voids in finished products.

Blowholes are secondary pipe holes in metal that can occur when gas bubbles are trapped as the molten metal in an ingot mold solidifies. Many of these blowholes are clean on the interior and are welded shut into sound metal during the first rolling or forging of the ingot. However, some do not weld and can appear as seams or laminations in finished products.

Segregation is a non-uniform distribution of various chemical constituents that can occur in a metal when an ingot or casting solidifies. Segregation can occur anywhere in the metal and is normally irregular in shape. However, there is a tendency for some constituents in the metal to concentrate in the liquid that solidifies last.
Porosity is holes in a material's surface or scattered throughout the material, caused by gases being liberated and trapped as the material solidifies.

Inclusions are impurities, such as slag, oxides, sulfides, etc., that occur in ingots and castings. Inclusions are commonly caused by incomplete refining of the metal ore or the incomplete mixing of deoxidizing materials added to the molten metal in the furnace.

Cooling cracks can occur in casting due to stresses resulting from cooling, and are often associated with changes in cross sections of the part. Cooling cracks can also occur when alloy and tool steel bars are rolled and subsequently cooled. Also, stresses can occur from uneven cooling which can be severe enough to crack the bars. Such cracks are generally longitudinal, but not necessarily straight. They can be quite long, and usually vary in depth along their length.

Shrinkage cracks can occur in castings due to stresses caused by the metal contracting as it cools and solidifies.
c. Primary Processing Flaws. Flaws which occur while working the metal down by hot or cold deformation into useful shapes such as bars, rods, wires, and forged shapes are primary processing flaws. Casting and welding are also considered primary processes although they involve molten metal, since they result in a semi-finished product. The following are brief descriptions of some primary processing flaws:

Seams are surface flaws, generally long, straight, and parallel to the longitudinal axis of the material, which can originate from ingot blowholes and cracks, or be introduced by drawing or rolling processes.

Laminations are formed in rolled plate, sheet, or strip when blowholes or internal fissures are not welded tight during the rolling process and are enlarged and flattened into areas of horizontal discontinuities.

Flakes are internal ruptures that can occur in metal as a result of cooling too rapidly. Flaking generally occurs deep in a heavy section of metal. Certain alloys are more susceptible to flaking than others.

Forging laps are the result of metal being folded over and forced into the surface, but not welded to form a single piece. They can be caused by faulty dies, oversized dies, oversized blanks, or improper handling of the metal in the die. They can occur on any area of the forging.

Forging bursts are internal or external ruptures that occur when forging operations are started before the material to be forged reaches the proper temperature throughout. Hotter sections of the forging blank tend to flow around the colder sections causing internal bursts or cracks on the surface. Too rapid or too severe a reduction in a section can also cause forging bursts or cracks.

A hot tear is a pulling apart of the metal that can occur in castings when the metal contracts as it solidifies.
Cupping is a series of internal metal ruptures created when the interior metal does not flow as rapidly as the surface metal during drawing or extruding processes. Segregation in the center of a bar usually contributes to the occurrence.
A cold shut is a failure of metal to fuse. It can occur in castings when part of the metal being poured into the mold cools and does not fuse with the rest of the metal into a solid piece.

Incomplete weld penetration is a failure of the weld metal to penetrate completely through a joint before solidifying.
Incomplete weld fusion occurs in welds where the temperature has not been high enough to melt the parent metal adjacent to the weld.

Weld undercutting is a decrease in the thickness of the parent material at the toe of the weld caused by welding at too high a temperature.

Cracks in the weld metal can be caused by the contraction of a thin section of the metal cooling faster than a heavier section or by incorrect heat or type of filler rod. They are one of the more common types of flaws found in welds.
Weld crater cracks are star shaped cracks that can occur at the end of a weld run.

Cracks in the weld heat-affected zone can occur because of stress induced in the material adjacent to the weld by its expansion and contraction from thermal changes.

A slag inclusion is a nonmetallic solid material that becomes trapped in the weld metal or between the weld metal and the base metal.

Scale is an oxide formed on metal by the chemical action of the surface metal with oxygen from the air.
d. Secondary Processing or Finishing Flaws. This category includes those flaws associated with the various finishing operations, after the part has been rough-formed by rolling, forging, casting or welding. Flaws may be introduced by heat treating, grinding, and similar processes. The following are brief descriptions of some secondary processing or finishing flaws.

Machining tears can occur when working a part with a dull cutting tool or by cutting to a depth that is too great for the mate rial being worked. The metal does not break away clean, and the tool leaves a rough, tom surface which contains numerous short discontinuities that can be classified as cracks.

Heat treating cracks are caused by stresses setup by unequal heating or cooling of portions of a part during heat treating opera tions. Generally, they occur where a part has a sudden change of section that could cause an uneven cooling rate, or at fillets and notches that act as stress concentration points.

Grinding cracks are thermal type cracks similar to heat treating cracks and can occur when hardened surfaces are ground. The overheating created by the grinding can be caused by the wheel becoming glazed so that it rubs instead of cutting the surface; by using too little coolant; by making too heavy a cut; or by feeding the material too rapidly. Generally, the cracks are at right angles to the direction of grinding and in severe cases a complete network of cracks can appear. Grinding cracks are usually shallow and very sharp at their roots, which makes them potential sources of fatigue failure.

Etching cracks can occur when hardened surfaces containing internal residual stresses are etched in acid.
Plating cracks can occur when hardened surfaces are electroplated. Generally. they are found in areas where high residual stresses remain from some previous operation involving the part.

e. In-Service Flaws. These flaws are formed after all fabrication has been completed and the aircraft. engine, or related component has gone into service. These flaws are attributable to aging effects caused by either time, flight cycles. service operating conditions, or combinations of these effects. The following are brief descriptions of some in-service flaws.

Stress corrosion cracks can develop on the surface of parts that are under tension stress in service and are also exposed to a cor rosive environment, such as the inside of wing skins, sump areas, and areas between two metal parts of faying surfaces.

Overstress cracks can occur when a part is stressed beyond the level for which it was designed. Such overstressing can occur as the result of a hard landing, turbulence, accident, or related damage due to some unusual or emergency condition not anticipated by the designer, or because of the failure of some related structural member.
Fatigue cracks can occur in parts that have been subjected to repeated or changing loads while in service, such as riv eted lap joints in aircraft fuselages. The crack usually starts at a highly-stressed area and propagates through the section until failure occurs. A fatigue crack will start more readily where the design or surface condition provides a point of stress concentration. Common stress concentration points are: fillets; sharp radii; or poor surface finish, seams, or grinding cracks.

Unbonds, or disbonds, are flaws where adhesive attaches to only one surface in an adhesive-bonded assembly. They can be the result of crushed, broken, or corroded cores in adhesive-bonded structures. Areas of unbonds have no strength and place additional stress on the surrounding areas making failure more likely.

Delamination is the term used to define the separation of composite material layers within a monolithic structure. Ultrasonic testing is the primary method used for the detection of delamination in composite structures.

» Read More...

Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Description:

Non destructive testing NDT) are noninvasive techniques to determine the integrity of a material, component or structure or quantitatively measure some characteristic of an object. In contrast to destructive testing, NDT is an assessment without doing harm, stress or destroying the test object. The destruction of the test object usually makes destructive testing more costly and it is also inappropriate in many circumstances.

NDT plays a crucial role in ensuring cost effective operation, safety and reliability of plant, with resultant benefit to the community. NDT is used in a wide range of industrial areas and is used at almost any stage in the production or life cycle of many components. The mainstream applications are in aerospace, power generation, automotive, railway, petrochemical and pipeline markets. NDT of welds is one of the most used applications. It is very difficult to weld or mold a solid object that has no risk of breaking in service, so testing at manufacture and during use is often essential.

While originally NDT was applied only for safety reasons it is today widely accepted as cost saving technique in the quality assurance process. Unfortunately NDT is still not used in many areas where human life or ecology is in danger. Some may prefer to pay the lower costs of claims after an accident than applying of NDT. That is a form of unacceptable risk management. Disasters like the railway accident in Eschede Germany in 1998 is only one example, there are many others.

For implementation of NDT it is important to describe what shall be found and what to reject. A completely flawless production is almost never possible. For this reason testing specifications are indispensable. Nowadays there exists a great number of standards and acceptance regulations. They describe the limit between good and bad conditions, but also often which specific NDT method has to be used.

The reliability of an NDT Method is an essential issue. But a comparison of methods is only significant if it is referring to the same task. Each NDT method has its own set of advantages and disadvantages and, therefore, some are better suited than others for a particular application. By use of artificial flaws, the threshold of the sensitivity of a testing system has to be determined. If the the sensitivity is to low defective test objects are not always recognized. If the sensitivity is too high parts with smaller flaws are rejected which would have been of no consequence to the serviceability of the component. With statistical methods it is possible to look closer into the field of uncertainly. Methods such as Probability of Detection (POD) or the ROC-method "Relative Operating Characteristics" are examples of the statistical analysis methods. Also the aspect of human errors has to be taken into account when determining the overall reliability.

Personnel Qualification is an important aspect of non-destructive evaluation. NDT techniques rely heavily on human skill and knowledge for the correct assessment and interpretation of test results. Proper and adequate training and certification of NDT personnel is therefore a must to ensure that the capabilities of the techniques are fully exploited. There are a number of published international and regional standards covering the certification of competence of personnel. The EN 473 (Qualification and certification of NDT personnel - General Principles) was developed specifically for the European Union for which the SNT-TC-1A is the American equivalent.

The nine most common NDT Methods are shown in the main index of this encyclopedia. In order of most used, they are: Ultrasonic Testing (UT), Radiographic Testing (RT), Electromagnetic Testing (ET) in which Eddy Current Testing (ECT) is well know and Acoustic Emission (AE or AET). Besides the main NDT methods a lot of other NDT techniques are available, such as Shearography Holography, Microwave and many more and new methods are being constantly researched and developed.

NDT Applications and Limitations

NDT Method Applications
Limitations
Liquid Penetrant
  • used on nonporous materials
  • can be applied to welds, tubing, brazing, castings, billets, forgings, aluminium parts, turbine blades and disks, gears
  • need access to test surface
  • defects must be surface breaking
  • decontamination & precleaning of test surface may be needed
  • vapour hazard
  • very tight and shallow defects difficult to find
  • depth of flaw not indicated
Magnetic Particle
  • ferromagnetic materials
  • surface and slightly subsurface flaws can be detected
  • can be applied to welds, tubing, bars, castings, billets, forgings, extrusions, engine components, shafts and gears
  • detection of flaws limited by field strength and direction
  • needs clean and relatively smooth surface
  • some holding fixtures required for some magnetizing techniques
  • test piece may need demagnetization which can be difficult for some shapes and magetizations
  • depth of flaw not indicated
Eddy Current
  • metals, alloys and electroconductors
  • sorting materials
  • surface and slightly subsurface flaws can be detected
  • used on tubing, wire, bearings, rails, nonmetal coatings, aircraft components, turbine blades and disks, automotive transmission shafts
  • requires customized probe
  • although non-contacting it requires close proximity of probe to part
  • low penetration (typically 5mm)
  • false indications due to uncontrolled parametric variables
Ultrasonics
  • metals, nonmetals and composites
  • surface and slightly subsurface flaws can be detected
  • can be applied to welds, tubing, joints, castings, billets, forgings, shafts, structural components, concrete, pressure vessels, aircraft and engine components
  • used to determine thickness and mechanical properties
  • monitoring service wear and deterioration
  • usually contacting, either direct or with intervening medium required (e.g. immersion testing)
  • special probes are required for applications
  • sensitivity limited by frequency used and some materials cause significant scattering
  • scattering by test material structure can cause false indications
  • not easily applied to very thin materials
Radiography Neutron
  • metals, nonmetals, composites and mixed materials
  • used on pyrotechnics, resins, plastics, organic material, honeycomb structures, radioactive material, high density materials, and materials containing hydrogen
  • access for placing test piece between source and detectors
  • size of neutron source housing is very large (reactors) for reasonable source strengths
  • collimating, filtering or otherwise modifying beam is difficult
  • radiation hazards
  • cracks must be oriented parallel to beam for detection
  • sensitivity decreases with increasing thickness
Radiography X-ray
  • metals, nonmetals, composites and mixed materials
  • used on all shapes and forms; castings, welds, electronic assemblies, aerospace, marine and automotive components
  • access to both sides of test piece needed
  • voltage, focal spot size and exposure time critical
  • radiation hazards
  • cracks must be oriented parallel to beam for detection
  • sensitivity decreases with increasing thickness
Radiography Gamma
  • usually used on dense or thick material
  • used on all shapes and forms; castings, welds, electronic assemblies, aerospace, marine and automotive components
  • used where thickness or access limits X-ray generators
  • radiation hazards
  • cracks must be oriented parallel to beam for detection
  • sensitivity decreases with increasing thickness
  • access to both sides of test piece needed
  • not as sensitive as X-rays

» Read More...

DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION

NDTType of operation.
Manual or mechanised.

Equipment.
Minimum - aerosols containing dye, developer, cleaner.
Maximum - Tanks, work handling gear, ultra-violet lamp.

Mode of operation.
A special dye is applied to the surface of the article to be tested. A suitable time interval allows it to soak into any surface defects. The surface is then freed from surplus dye and the dye in the crack revealed by either: applying a white powder developer into which the dye is absorbed producing a colour indication,or, illuminating with ultra-violet light under which the dye fluoresces, that is, emits visible light. This must be done where normal lighting is subdued.

Operating parameters.
Portability : excellent (for aerosols)
Access : good
Minimum defect size : 0.025 mm wide
Time : 30 minutes approx.

Materials.
Any - non porous.

Typical welding applications.
Root runs in pipe butt welds.
Leak paths in containers.


Overall advantages.
Low cost.
Direct indication of defect location.
Initial examination by unskilled labour.

Overall limitations.
Surface defects only detected.
Defects cannot readily be rewelded due to trapped dye.
Rough welds produce spurious indications.

Safety.
Dye and propellant gases have low flash points.

» Read More...

Advances in Non-Destructive Inspection and Evaluation of Welds

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Welding is widely used in the fabrication of nearly all industrial components. Despite the best care taken during design, fabrication and inspection, many of the welded components fail especially at the weld and heat affected zones, drastically influencing the performance reliability and component availability. Majority of the failures are attributed to improper design of weld joint, selection of base materials and filler materials, welding processes, residual stresses, inspection procedures and operating parameters. One way to minimise the failures of welded components is to impart non destructive testing (NDT) procedures i) immediately after the fabrication to make sure the welded joint is defect-free and ii) during the service life of welded components to ensure that no unacceptable defects are present and grow [1]. Variety of NDT techniques exits and nearly every form of energy is used in NDT field to device methods for detection and evaluation of nearly all kinds of defects, be they surface or internal. While a few basic NDT methods such as penetrant, ultrasonic, radiography, visual testing are sufficient and routinely employed for the inspection of welds, use of advanced NDT techniques is resorted to when high sensitivity detection and quantitative characterisation of harmful defects is envisaged. Often, signal and image processing methods are adopted to meet these objectives. While NDT data on defect dimensions helps fracture mechanics to assess the health of a welded component, it is fracture mechanics based analysis that acts as a driving force for developments in the science and technology of NDT by putting straight demand to detect very small defects as and when they are formed in the component [2]. In this paper, after a brief review of conventional NDT methods, advances made in the field of x-radiography, eddy current and ultrasonic methods are discussed. Also use of acoustic emission and infrared thermography methods for on-line monitoring and control of welding processes and for integrity assessment of welded pressure vessels are discussed. The techniques used for evaluation of residual stresses in welded components are also covered.

2.0 CONVENTIONAL NDT TECHNIQUES

No weld is completely perfect. Despite the best care taken during design, fabrication and inspection, many of the welded components fail especially at the weld and heat affected zones due to cracks, residual stresses and variations in microstructure and mechanical properties, all of which are often grouped together and referred to as discontinuities or simply defects, if harmful. Weld defects can be classified broadly as cracks (crater, transverse, toe, under bead, fusion line and root cracks), cavities, porosities, slag inclusions, incomplete fusion or penetration, poor fusion, under cut, excessive reinforcement, imperfect shape or unacceptable contour, spatter, arc strikes etc. Cracks are considered more harmful and they are usually classified as longitudinal or transverse or toe or crater cracks depending on their orientation. Also based on the temperature of formation, they are termed as hot cracks or cold cracks. Porosity and slag inclusion are also harmful defects and they are caused by entrapment of gases and oxides and non-metallic solids in the weld metal during the solidification.

A variety of NDT techniques are available for detection and characterisation of defects in welds. All NDT techniques are based on physical principles. Nearly every form of energy is used as probing medium in NDT. Likewise nearly every property of the materials to be inspected has been made the basis for some method or technique of NDT. In general, NDT methods involve subjecting the material (being examined) to some form of external energy source (X-rays, ultrasonic, thermal wave, electromagnetic fields etc.) and analysing the detected response signals (refracted energy, induced voltage and diffracted energy). The essential parts of any NDT method are 1) application of a probing or inspection medium, 2) modification of the probing or inspection medium by defects or variations in the structure or properties of the material, 3) detection of this change by suitable detector or sensor, 4) conversion of this change into a suitable signal or image and 5) interpretation of the information obtained [2]. For example, in the case of X-ray film radiography of welds, 1) the X-rays are the probing or inspecting medium, 2) any defects in the weld being radiographed modify the intensity of the radiation reaching the film on the opposite side of the weld, 3) certain silver bromide emulsions are sensitive to X-rays and are used as a detector, 4) the emulsions are capable of recording variations in X-ray intensity and by proper developing, a permanent record is made, and 5) interpretation is then a process of explaining variations in density of the radiograph. Some of the widely used NDT techniques for the examination of welded structures include; visual, liquid penetrant, leak, magnetic particle, ultrasonic, eddy current, Gamma and X radiography, acoustic emission, potential drop, infrared thermography etc. As NDT measurements are indirect, artificial standard defects are used to set the instruments, sensors and test procedures for a desired performance. Further, since NDT operator decides the success of an inspection method, experienced or certified skilled personnel are specified for interpretation of NDT results.
3.0 ADVANCES IN NDT TECHNIQUES

3.1VISUAL TECHNIQUES

Visual techniques play an important role in quick assessment of the quality of welds and to identify various defects like undercut, lake of penetration etc. The basic design of the borescopes, which has been in use for many decades for visual examination, has been modified accommodating the state-of-the-art advances in video, illumination, robotic, optical and computer technologies. Developments in image processing, artificial intelligence, video technology and other related fields have significantly improved the capability of visual techniques [3]. Present day demand for higher performance and faster production exceed the abilities of visual tests by humans. Consequently, visual tests made by human eye are being replaced by automated visual testing using optical instruments and unstaffed inspection stations. Such aspects are usually referred to as machine vision.

Geometrical imperfections such as improper weld ripples, convexity and concavity need to be detected in inaccessible regions. Replica technique is ideal for such applications. In this technique, the profile of a defect region is replicated using silicon rubber compound and the dimensions of the defect region are measured using profile projector which can achieve an accuracy of + 5 microns. The hardware for the replica technique essentially consists of manual injection device, mixing guns, silicone rubber compound, injection head, spring loaded CRS plugs and recovery cork screw head. Replica technique has been adopted for examination of a number of joints in the reheater of Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR). Similarly, for measuring concavity and convexity of weld joints videoimagescope is preferred. It is an advanced version of the flexible fiberscope in which a CCD chip is used for imaging. Compared to fiberscopes, videoimagescopes provide high resolution and brighter images. With the introduction of advanced image management functions and measurement capabilities, accurate measurements of internal profiles of tube are possible. A variety of viewing tips with varying field of view are available which can be used depending on the nature and type of application. Similarly, images can be suitably enhanced through image processing functions such as contrast stretching and edge enhancement. Using the 3-D graphic measurement system, it is possible to measure the length, width etc. on the images very accurately. Commercially available Olympus videoimagescope model IVC-6 has been used for measuring concavity and convexity of a number of joints of Reheaters of PFBR [4].

3.2 RADIOGRAPHY

As the X-ray absorption coefficient depends strongly on material density, radiography is particularly effective at detecting volumetric defects, which contain either extra mass or missing mass (such as slag inclusions or porosity). The benchmark for radiographic inspection of welds is still high-quality film radiography and good radiographic practice is now enshrined by a series of national standards, covering factors such as choice of voltage, film–source distances, intensifiers, image quality indicators, film density, film processing, etc. There have been a number of advances in radiography over the past 10–15 years including more reliable microfocus tubes, real-time radiography and the application of image processing techniques to sharpen the image and to increase the contrast. For better definition of defects and delectability of small defects like micro-cracks in thin components and complex geometries, high resolution micro-focal X radiography has an edge over the conventional radiography. One of the important applications of micro-focal radiography is evaluation of tube to tube sheet weld joints of PFBR steam generators (made by welding between pull out of tube sheet and the tube).

The most significant recent development in radiography has been the real-time radiography. Real time radiography or fluoroscopy differs from conventional radiography in that the X ray image is observed on a fluorescent screen rather than recorded on a film. Fluoroscopy has the advantages of high speed and low cost of inspection. Present day real time systems use image intensifiers, video camera and monitor. The principal advantages of real-time radiography are that it is well suited to automation and the images of the component under inspection are available directly without time delays due to film exposure and processing. Furthermore, as the images are provided in digital form, image processing and automatic defect interpretation softwares can be readily incorporated into the inspection system. On-line monitoring of welding is another possibility by real time radiography. Direct examination of the welds in real time saves films and time and is found to be cost effective in the long run [5]. The use of microfocal units in conjunction with image intensifying system greatly enhances the versatility and sensitivity of the real time radiography, by way of zooming or projection magnification.

With the advent of image processing systems, the sensitivity that can be achieved is comparable to film sensitivity. The stored or digitized X-ray image can be subjected to image processing and enhancement techniques such as contrast stretching, edge enhancement, special filtering, differentiation, averaging, and pattern recognition for enhanced detection of defects and also for obtaining quantitative information. The versatility of image processing is that this can be performed in real time as well as on film images. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show typical radiograph of a weld joint. Figure 1(a) gives the raw image wherein penetrameter wires are not clearly seen. After contrast stretching and image enhancement (Fig. 1(b)), the lack of penetration can be seen and the wire penetrameters can be identified thereby increasing the sensitivity.

3.3 ULTRASONICS

Ultrasonics is now the major NDT technique used for validation of welded structures in many pre-service as well as in-service applications. Ultrasonics is a preferred technique over X-radiography in in-service inspections is due to inherent limitations in radiography and to actual benefits in applying ultrasonics. Ultrasonic waves are scattered by both planar and volumetric defects, making the ultrasonic technique useful for detecting and sizing both types of defects. Even closed cracks are detectable by ultrasonics if appropriate procedures are used. Unlike radiography, ultrasonics also readily gives depth information concerning a defect. Ultrasonics also offers benefits over radiography in terms of cost savings through increased productivity and safety. In the last few decades, ultrasonics has developed from a purely manual technique, to a manual technique with computer-assisted processing, to the use of automatic scanners and more recently to the development of fully automated systems incorporating multiple piezoelectric transducers for weld assessment. Studies clearly establish the fact that the probability of detecting a defect with ultrasonics increases with the degree of sophistication of the system. Ultrasonic methods are also widely used for measurement of residual stresses and also for characterisation of microstructures [6]. For these studies, ultrasonic velocity is preferred to attenuation measurements.

The use of ultrasonics to establish the integrity of welded structures requires not only reliable defect detection but also sufficiently accurate defect location and sizing using amplitude dependent techniques (e.g. 20 dB drop, 6 dB drop, or comparison with the amplitude expected from a drilled hole). However, these techniques are known to be inaccurate. The incorporation of computer-assisted processing into ultrasonic systems has allowed the easy implementation of potentially better methods for defect detection and sizing such as time-of-flight-diffraction (TOFD). TOFD has the ability to capture high-resolution, low amplitude signals and perform real time processing to carry out crack tip diffraction examination (Fig.2) [7]. It lends itself ideally to fast volumetric detection applications where inspection results need to be of sufficient quality to enable decisive on line action. This speed is achieved by virtue of the fact that a wide beam, tandem array of transducers and scanned parallel to the weld, are usually sufficient to achieve full coverage and scan rates upto 50mm/s without the need for comprehensive raster scanning and probe skewing. There are also efforts to develop multi probe system (instead of two probe system) capable of inspecting the given weld region of the pressure vessel as well as building a prototype nozzle scanner based on the same technique. The multiprobe system is capable of detecting and locating defects in the given weld region throughout the full depth of the pressure vessel and to a width of t/L on either side of the weld region. It uses sixteen probes controlled by a computer with automated data acquisition and processing. It is intended to size defects within ± 2mm and size all defects greater than 5mm in depth below the interface between the stainless steel cladding and the carbon steel plate.

Important advances in defect sizing for weld inspection have also been made possible by the incorporation in automated ultrasonic systems of ultrasonics imaging based on synthetic aperture focussing (SAFT) and variants such as SUPERSAFT. When the transducer is located directly above a defect, the time delay to receive the defect echo is minimal. As the transducer moves away from this position, the time delay increases in a non-linear fashion. The curve defined by tracing the peak amplitude (in each aperture element) as the transducer moves parallel to the surface is a function of the speed of the sound in the material and the geometry of the transducer and the target. The first synthetic aperture processing step is to choose a collection of aperture elements to be processed as a unit, herein after referred as the ‘aperture’. The essence of SAFT processing is to introduce a time shift to each individual A-scans which varies with time delay introduced by the test system geometry, to sum these individual aperture elements point by point across their length, and then to place the result at the center of the chosen aperture. Reflections coming from defect are constructively added and other signals such as grain noise and electronic noise are destructively summed, resulting in good signal to noise ratio for the defect [8]. When scanning is done in one direction (X), we get only two dimensional amplitude distribution corresponding to the area below the scanned line and perpendicular to the scanned surface thus performing a side view (B Scan).

The microstructures of austenitic welds cause special concerns for ultrasonic testing. These materials strongly attenuate ultrasonic waves, cause high background noise due to scattering from the large grains present, and result in skewing of the ultrasonic beam unless the propagation is along principal axes. Considerable progress has already been made on detailed modelling of wave propagation in austenitic materials and on using neural networks for defect recognition and automated decision making. Various options exist for the improved generation and detection of ultrasound in welding applications, e.g. by the use of phased arrays, laser techniques and other specialist probes. Increasingly, electromagnetic transducers (EMATs) are finding application in the non-contact generation of horizontally polarised shear waves which have a number of advantages in weld testing. Phased array angle beam EMAT systems capable of exciting narrow band, obliquely propagating bulk waves with controlled direction and focusing are available [7]. The phased array EMATs provide a greater flexibility in both the selection of wave modes and angles of propagation. Experimental investigations were carried out using the SH waves generated by EMATs for defect sizing by TOFD method. Two 8-segmented EMATs were designed for their use as transmitter and receiver in pitch-catch mode. Test and instrument parameters were optimised for high sensitive detection of diffracted signals. Besides signal averaging, cross-correlation and analytical signal processing using Hilbert transform were adopted to enhance SNR and to improve accuracy in the transit time measurements and in turn the defect sizing. Experimental studies were carried out on fatigue cracks and machined notches in carbon steel and stainless steel specimens. Typical rf signal from a 28 mm deep fatigue crack in 56 mm thick carbon steel sample is shown in Fig.3. The back wall and diffracted echoes are clearly seen. The beam entry point was determined by the back-wall echo arrival time and analytic signal method was implemented for precise transit time measurements. From the transit time measurements, using distance between EMATs and angle of insonificaiton, defect depths were calculated and a correlation coefficient of 0.99 was observed between actual and calculated defect depths. EMATs are particularly attractive for high temperature and radioactive components and also for components with limited access, primarily due to the fact that EMATs do not need couplant to transfer ultrasonic energy. Two major limitations in using EMATs for a number of practical applications are the physical size of the source of magnetic field (a few tens of millimeters) and the low transduction efficiency (due to weak Lorenz and magnetostrictive driving forces) as compared to piezoelectric transducers.

3.4 EDDY CURRENT TESTING

Conventional eddy current (EC) testing of welds is affected by surface roughness, microstructural variations, delta-ferrite, lift-off, edge-effect etc. Presence of these disturbing variables significantly influences the defect detection as well as sizing. In order to realize quick detection and accurate on-line depth evaluation of defects in the presence of such disturbing variables, an artificial neural network (ANN) based approach has been developed. This uses a three-layer feed forward error back-propagation type network with one hidden layer and one output node that gives the defect depth in user defined units. In this method, the digitized real and imaginary components of EC probe impedance are given as input to an optimized neural network. The network output is evaluated and displayed continuously. The performance of the network has been evaluated on stainless steel plates and welds for detection and depth evaluation of surface-breaking machined notches in the presence of disturbing variables. Systematic optimization studies have revealed that a 12-5-1 architecture is optimum and can detect weld defects as small as 0.4 mm deep with an accuracy of +0.04 mm (Fig. 4) A network trained with holes and notches has detected with 100 % success both notches and holes. However, for accurate depth evaluation, it has been necessary to use separate networks [9]. The on-line ANN approach has been successfully applied to thin walled stainless steel tubes with periodic wall thickness variations for detection and accurate quantification of depth of defects.

Defects, which are described as three-dimensional functions of the space co-ordinates, cannot be completely reconstructed by scanning an eddy current probe coil over a defect in one direction and even by using sophisticated signal processing methods. On the other hand, a definite benefit exists if raster-scan imaging is made and the results are presented in the form of a gray level or pseudo color image. Eddy current imaging (ECI) is a recently emerging trend in the field of eddy current imaging. There are many advantages that follow the image format. It is rather comfortable to interpret the images of defects, as compared to the dynamic impedance display. Another advantage of the image format lies in the ability of the human eye and brain to readily discern irregularities in an image by comparing different regions. Further, the processed image and the defect details provide an objective and documentable information that could, e.g. be used to monitor the growth of defects with time. More important, process automation is possible because computers perform raster-scan imaging as well as data/image processing. An ECI system has been built around a PC at the author’s laboratory to scan the object surface and create impedance grey level images (Fig. 5). Eddy current images of welds, notches, corrosion pits and cracks in austenitic stainless steels have been obtained using the ECI system.

The precise location of the weld centre line, in the inner vessel of PFBR, is required as feedback information for remote operation of robots for detailed inspection of the welds by ultrasonic techniques. ECI method has been developed to precisely locate the weld centre line. Figure 6 shows the 3-D profile image of the weldment. Due to predominant variations in the electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability (due to the presence of delta ferrite) of the weld metal, this region is distinctly brought out. The changes in the material properties affect the probe impedance. The change in the impedance varies from the base metal - weld interface to the weld - base metal interface and reaches a peak at the centre of the weld. This peak is clearly observed in the 3-D profile (Fig. 6). Thus the precise location of the weld centre line is found from this profile by measuring the distance along Y-axis from the origin i.e. starting point of the scanning. The accuracy of detection of the weld centre line is found to be + 0.1 mm.

ECI also has been performed on welds for detection and sizing of defects in welds. However, three major problems have been noticed. They are 1) blurring of images as probe diameter is large, 2) noisy images due to the influence of disturbing variables and 3) time intensiveness. In order to realize fast and automated detection and enhanced characterization of surface defects in austenetic stainless steels, an intelligent imaging scheme has been developed by synergistically combining neural network and image processing methods [10]. This scheme involves:

The imaging scheme has been validated on austenetic stainless steel plates and welds consisting of machined defects as well as natural defects. The imaging scheme has been successfully applied to welds for automatic detection and evaluation of longitudinal as well transverse notches. It has been observed that the scheme has been able to reliably detect all the defects present in the imaged regions and evaluate their length, width, depth and orientation, suppressing the dominance of welds variations and presence of magnetic delta-ferrite have not degraded the performance of the scheme (Fig. 7). Defects deeper than 0.4 mm have been detected and characterized with a ten-fold reduction in imaging time. Further, the scheme has clearly brought down the computer memory requirements for storage of image data, due to the fact that only the image data of fine-scan imaging regions has been stored.

3.5 ACOUSTIC EMISSION TECHNIQUE

Acoustic Emission Technique (AET) is an important NDT technique. Its origination lies in the phenomenon of rapid release of energy within a component in the form of a transient elastic wave resulting from dynamic changes like deformation, crack initiation and propagation, leakage etc. It is a real time technique which can detect initiation and growth of cracks, plastic deformation, fatigue failure, leaks etc. AET is used during hydrotesting of as-fabricated welded vessels and also in service during their hydrotesting. AET is also used for on-line inspection of welded vessels and pipe lines for monitoring their structural integrity. In addition to this, of late AET is being considered for on line weld monitoring during fabrication for simultaneous detection of defects as the welding progresses [11]. The defects so found can be immediately rectified thus avoiding the completion of defective weld, saving time and money. AET has been successfully used for on line monitoring of welds prepared by TIG, submerged arc, electroslag welding etc. However, non slag forming welding methods are most suitable for AE monitoring. The defects that can be detected, located and quantitatively evaluated by AE monitoring during welding are: (1) Weld cracking associated with phase transformation, (2) Nucleation and growth of cracks during welding and subsequent cooling e.g., delayed cracking, (3) Porosity and slag inclusions, (4) Microfissuring, (5) Hot and cold cracking and (6) Reheat cracks. Once weld defects are located, they are further probed using other NDT techniques for in-depth analysis.

AE technique has been used for on-line monitoring during resistance spot welding. Figure 8 shows the typical pattern of AE signals generated during resistant spot welding. By judicious analysis of the signals generated during different periods of the welding cycle, it has been possible to identify good and bad wleds and also the shear strength of the nugget can be estimated using AE parameters. The AE generated can be related to the weld quality parameters such as strength and size of the nugget, the amount of expulsion and the amount of cracking. Therefore, in-process AE monitoring can be used both as an examination method and also as a means for providing feedback control.

3.6 ALTERNATING CURRENT POTNETIAL DROP TECHNIQUES

Ultrasonic and alternating current potential drop (ACPD) methods are the only two established NDT techniques used for measuring crack depth in welds. Unlike ultrasonic inspection, which is used for both detection and sizing, ACPD is used almost exclusively for crack sizing. The ACPD method is only applicable to surface breaking cracks and requires electrical contact with the specimen. The surface current introduced into the specimen by the ACPD technique induces a magnetic field in free space above the specimen surface. Mapping of the perturbation of this magnetic field provides an alternative means of measuring crack depth and crack length without the requirement for a contacting probe. This technique is also termed as alternating magnetic field measurement (ACFM). ACFM offers the capability of both detection and sizing of surface breaking defects without the need for calibration and without the requirement for cleaning to the base metal. This technique is finding increasing application, particularly in weld inspection in offshore platforms.

3.7 INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY (IRT) TECHNIQUE

Measurements for this NDE technique are derived from changes in thermal resistance that arise in the flow of heat through the components. These changes can be detected by infrered cameras that are sensitive to surface temperature differences of less than 0.1 degrees Celsius. Precisely, IRT let one "see" heat [1, 2]. It is non-contact and fairly simple and it offers speed and high resolution plus the advantage of full-field imaging. IRT is also capable of providing very detailed images of situations invisible to the naked eye. By taking a thermograph of site electrical panels, thermographers develop and read a "heat picture" which reveals components that are overloaded or may become faulty. Unlike normal component operating conditions, faulty components exhibit readily detectable temperature increases over the ambient temperature profile. IRT verifies that electrical connections are properly made and maintained. IRT also detects hot spots that might be overlooked by visual inspections. IRT can be used to characterize defects in welds and voids in materials such as gaps in adhesive layers or air bubbles as these they have a much higher thermal resistance than the surrounding material. IRT has been used for the on-line monitoring of weld pools as part of intelligent processing of materials.

3.8 X-RAY DIFFRACTION (XRD) TECHNIQUE FOR RESIDUAL STRESSES

Residual stresses are introduced in industrial components during welding process and also during the service life of the welded component due to loading conditions. For example, the stresses are introduced during welding process due to nonuniform heat distribution taking place during the welding process. Several destructive and nondestructive techniques are presently available for the residual stress measurements. Destructive techniques cannot be applied on finished components and are time consuming and uneconomical. Therefore NDT techniques are preferred for residual stress measurements [12]. Some of these techniques include: (i) Ultrasonic (ii) X Ray Diffraction (XRD), (iii) Acoustic Barkhausen Noise (ABN) and (IV) Magnetic Barkhausen Noise (MBN). Additionally, semi destructive hole drilling strain gauge technique is also employed for measurement of residual stresses. Ultrasonic technique of evaluating residual stresses is based on the measurement of changes in the velocity of ultrasonic waves due to stress and by establishing the acousto-elastic constant. Several methods using ultrasonic waves of various types such as longitudinal, transverse and surface waves have been tried with varying degree of success for weldments. MBN and ABN techniques are based on Barkhausen effect and applicable only to ferromagnetic metals and alloys. Barkhausen effect takes place when a magnetic field is swept in the material along a hysteresis loop. MBN is due to irreversible change in magnetic domain movements during hysteresis and ABN is due to elastic deformation associated with magnetic domain rotation during irreversible changes in magnetization. MBN signals can be acquired by sensor coil or by Hall type probe and ABN signals are acquired by piezoelectric transducers. Both MBN and ABN signals are strong functions of stress condition and hence stresses can be assessed by analysing the MBN and ABN signals. XRD technique measures the change in the interplanar spacing of the lattice in the presence of stresses in a material. It is well known that peak intensity of diffracted X ray beam occurs when Bragg's law is satisfied. In the presence of elastic macro-stresses, there is shift in the diffraction peak positions. The magnitude of the shift gives a measure of the stress and the direction of the shift depends on the nature of the stresses i.e. whether they are tensile or compressive.

XRD technique has been used to measure the residual stresses before and after post weld heat treatment (PWHT), in autogenous butt weld joints in 2.25 Cr-1 Mo steel tubes. The tubes are used in the steam generator assemblies of PFBR. Hot liquid sodium flows in the shell region (outside the tubes) and water inside the tubes. A leak in the tube will lead to the generation of hydrogen due to the reaction of sodium with water with dangerous consequences. Tube-to-tube sheet weld joints are the weakest regions where a leakage path can be formed with relative ease. Apart from the requirement in the quality control procedures that the weld joints should be free from unacceptable defects that may lead to leak paths, it is also considered essential to use a NDT technique to assess the residual stress (RS) pattern and to evaluate the PWHT to be used for removing the residual stresses whose presence, otherwise, may lead to the failure of the tube to tube sheet weld joint. The equipment used for the measurement of the residual stresses is a portable X-ray stress analyzer (Rigaku Strainflex MSF) and Sin2? multiplex method was used for the stress measurements. Figure 9 shows the residual stress variations across are of the weld joints prepared with pre heat. The variations on both the outside surface and the inside surface are shown. The tensile stress maximum occurs at the weld center line both on the outside and the inside surface. On the inside surface, the zero crossing of RS from tensile to compressive occurs about 2 cm away from the weld center line, as compared to 1cm on the outside surface. The maximum compressive stress level on the inside surface is also much higher than that on the outside surface. The asymmetry in the variation of RS both on the outside and the inside surfaces is attributed to the restraint offered by the tube sheet block on one side where the compressive stresses were found to be higher. Variation of stress distribution at different depths below the top surface is also shown in Fig. 9. These measurements were done after removing 50 to 150 micron layers on the outside surface. Surface removal was done by electropolishing only at the point of measurement so as to avoid any stress relaxation due to layer removal. It is seen that, within a depth of only 150 microns, the stresses approach zero values. This shows that the RS is restricted only to a thin layer at the top [13]. With the help of portable equipments, it is also possible to apply the technique on large objects and carry out the measurements in field and quickly. It can be used for quantitative analysis of macro and micro residual stresses separately.

4.0 SUMMARY

In this paper, advances in NDT techniques for inspection of welds for detection and quantitative characterisation of defects, residual stresses and microstructural variations are highlighted. Since the probing medium and the interactions are different, capabilities and limitations of various NDT techniques for defect detection and evaluation differ. Hence, selection of NDT technique for a specific inspection application is very important. To site an example, for detection of fatigue cracks in stainless steel welds, it is not surprising that eddy current and liquid penetrant testing are superior to ultrasonic testing and radiography. At the same time, the later techniques are capable of reliably detecting deep-seated volumetric defects, which go undetected by the former techniques. Prior to selection of an NDT technique, it is essential to obtain information about the location and type of defects such as nature, probable size and orientation using chemical composition, material properties, microstructure, fabrication procedure, operating environment and history details. Sensitivity, detectability, accessibility, speed and past experience play a major role in the selection of a technique for a specific application. It may sometimes be necessary to use a combination of two or more techniques, in the best complementary way, to carry out NDT testing in a reliable manner. For such situations, detailed mock up studies are essential prior to actual inspection to optimise instrument parameters, design and selection of sensors, calibration defects, and to prepare procedures for recording and evaluation of test data, to ultimately arrive at the desired sensitivity and reliability. The summary of applicability and capability of various NDT techniques for assessment of defects in welded components is given in Table.1 as a guide to choose an appropriate technique. Continuous developments are taking place in NDT techniques with concurrent advances in micro-electronics, computers, optics, materials and sensors. Today NDT is matured enough to take up nearly all kinds of challenging jobs in welded structures as regards to quick detection and sizing of harmful defects, almost as and when they form or before they grow to critical sizes causing catastrophic failure of components.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The encouragement and co-operation of Dr. Baldev Raj, Dr. S.L. Mannan, Dr. T. Jayakumar, Shri P. Kalyanasundaram and Shri B. Venkatraman, DPEND, IGCAR is gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks are due to Shri N. Raghu, Shri Sanjay K. Rai, Dr. Hasan and Dr. V. Shankar.

REFERENCES

1. Baldev Raj, C.V. Subramanian, T. Jayakumar, Non Destructive Testing of Welds, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 2000
2. Baldev Raj, T. Jayakumar, B.P.C. Rao, Review of NDT techniques for structural integrity, Sadhana, Indian Academy Proc. in Engineering Sciences, Vol. 20, 1995, pp. 5-38
3. B.P.C. Rao, Visual Techniques in Non-destructive Testing, Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology, Elsevier Science Ltd, September 2001, pp 6043-6046.
4. B.Venkatraman, V.Manoharan, T.Jayakumar and P.Kalyanasundaram, Quantitative Profiling of Internal Weld Contours through Videoimagescopy, Proc. of 15th World Conference on NDT, Rome, Oct. 2000.
5. B.Venkatraman, S.Saravanan, T.Jayakumar, P.Kalyanasundaram and Baldev Raj, Performance Evaluation of Real Time Radiographic Systems, Proc. of 14th World Conf. on Non Destructive Testing (14th WCNDT), New Delhi, India, 1996, Ed. C.G. Krishnadas Nair, Baldev Raj, C.R.L.Murthy and T.Jayakumar, Vol.3, pp. 1401-1404.
6. T.Jayakumar and K.V.Rajkumar, Advanced Ultrasonic Techniques for Evaluation of Materials, J. Pure and Applied Ultrasonics, 22, 2000, pp. 89-105.
7. B.P.C. Rao, T. Jayakumar, P. Kalyanasundaram and Baldev Raj, Ultrasonic detection and characterisation of defects using electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs), J of NDE (India), Vol.19, No.2, June 1999, pp 23-28.
8. M.Thavasimuthu, K.V. Rajkumar, T. Jayakumar, P. Kalyanasundaram and Baldev Raj, Ultrasonic Examination of Thin Walled Stainless Steel Tubes by Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique, Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Plenum Publ. Corp., New York, Vol. 18B, pp. 1987-1993.
9. B.P.C. Rao, Baldev Raj, T. Jayakumar and P. Kalyanasundaram, An artificial neural network for eddy current testing of austenetic stainless steel welds, NDT&E International, Vol. 35, No.6, 2002, pp 393-398
10. B.P.C. Rao, Baldev Raj, T. Jayakumar and P. Kalyanasundaram, An intelligent imaging scheme for automated eddy current testing, Nondestr. Test. Eval., Vol. 17, 2000, pp 41-57
11. T. Jayakumar, NDT Techniques: Acoustic Emission, Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology, Elsevier Science Ltd, September 2001, pp 6001-6004.
12. P.Palanichamy, A.Joseph, D.K.Bhattacharya and Baldev Raj, Residual Stresses and Their Evaluation in Welds, Welding Engineering Hand Book, Eds. S.Soundararajan, S.Vijaya Bhaskar and G.C.Amarnath Kumar, Radiant Publications Pvt. Ltd., Secundrabad, India, 1992, Vol. 1, pp. 269-296.
13. Sanjay K. Rai, T.Jayakumar, C.Babu Rao, D.K.Bhattacharya and Baldev Raj, Residual Stress Measurement in Ferritic Steel Tube Welds using X ray Diffraction Technique, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining 3, 1998, pp. 204-207.

Figure Captions
Fig 1 Positive print of a radiograph of a weld a) before image enchantment and b) after the image enchantment. Lack of penetration and wire penetrometers are clearly brought about image enhancement.
Fig. 2 Time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) technique for ultrasonic detection of defects in welds.
Fig. 3 Application of TOFD technique to an austenitic stainless steel weld using shear horizontal waves generated by EMATs
Fig. 4 Eddy current signals of an austenitic steel weld consisting of 2 longitudinal and 2 transverse notches (length 6 mm, width 0.3 mm and depths 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mm) and the results of application of the neural network method. The network eliminated all the weld variations, lift-off and edge effects and successfully detected all the 4 notches and evaluated their depth on-line.
Fig. 5 Eddy current imaging system developed to locate weld centerline in stainless steel welds.
Fig. 6 Determination of weld centerline in stainless steel welds using eddy current imaging.
Fig. 7 Application of intelligent eddy current imaging scheme to stainless steel welds for successful detection and sizing of a longitudinal and a transverse notch in the weld region.
Fig. 8 Typical acoustic emission response signals during resistance spot welding.
Fig. 9 Residual stress variation across a weld joint, as measured by XRD technique.

Table.1 Applicability and capability of various techniques for NDT of welds.

» Read More...

The ABC's of Nondestructive Weld Examination

An understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of each form of nondestructive examination can help you choose the best method for your application

The philosophy that often guides the fabrication of welded assemblies and structures is "to assure weld quality." However, the term "weld quality" is relative. The application determines what is good or bad. Generally, any weld is of good quality if it meets appearance requirements and will continue indefinitely to do the job for which it is intended. The first step in assuring weld quality is to determine the degree required by the application. A standard should be established based on the service requirements.

Standards designed to impart weld quality may differ from job to job, but the use of appropriate weld techniques can provide assurance that the applicable standards are being met. Whatever the standard of quality, all welds should be inspected, even if the inspection involves nothing more than the welder looking after his own work after each weld pass. A good-looking weld surface appearance is many times considered indicative of high weld quality. However, surface appearance alone does not assure good workmanship or internal quality.

Nondestructive examination (NDE) methods of inspection make it possible to verify compliance to the standards on an ongoing basis by examining the surface and subsurface of the weld and surrounding base material. Five basic methods are commonly used to examine finished welds: visual, liquid penetrant, magnetic particle, ultra-sonic and radiographic (X-ray). The growing use of computerization with some methods provides added image enhancement, and allows real-time or near real-time viewing, comparative inspections and archival capabilities. A review of each method will help in deciding which process or combination of processes to use for a specific job and in performing the examination most effectively.

Visual Inspection (VT)
Visual inspection is often the most cost-effective method, but it must take place prior to, during and after welding. Many standards require its use before other methods, because there is no point in submitting an obviously bad weld to sophisticated inspection techniques. The ANSI/AWS D1.1, Structural Welding Code - Steel, states, "Welds subject to nondestructive examination shall have been found acceptable by visual inspection." Visual inspection requires little equipment. Aside from good eyesight and sufficient light, all it takes is a pocket rule, a weld size gauge, a magnifying glass, and possibly a straight edge and square for checking straightness, alignment and perpendicularity.

Before the first welding arc is struck, materials should be examined to see if they meet specifications for quality, type, size, cleanliness and freedom from defects. Grease, paint, oil, oxide film or heavy scale should be removed. The pieces to be joined should be checked for flatness, straightness and dimensional accuracy. Likewise, alignment, fit-up and joint preparation should be examined. Finally, process and procedure variables should be verified, including electrode size and type, equipment settings and provisions for preheat or postheat. All of these precautions apply regardless of the inspection method being used.

During fabrication, visual examination of a weld bead and the end crater may reveal problems such as cracks, inadequate penetration, and gas or slag inclusions. Among the weld defects that can be recognized visually are cracking, surface slag inclusions, surface porosity and undercut.

On simple welds, inspecting at the beginning of each operation and periodically as work progresses may be adequate. Where more than one layer of metal filler is being deposited, however, it may be desirable to inspect each layer before depositing the next. The root pass of a multipass is most critical to weld soundness. It is especially susceptible to cracking, and because it solidifies quickly, it may trap gas and slag. On subsequent passes, conditions caused by the shape of the weld bead or changes in the joint configuration can cause further cracking, as well as undercut and slag trapping. Repair costs can be minimized if visual inspection detects these flaws before welding progresses.

Visual inspection at an early stage of production can also prevent underwelding and overwelding. Welds that are smaller than called for in the specifications cannot be tolerated. Beads that are too large increase costs unnecessarily and can cause distortion through added shrinkage stress.

After welding, visual inspection can detect a variety of surface flaws, including cracks, porosity and unfilled craters, regardless of subsequent inspection procedures. Dimensional variances, warpage and appearance flaws, as well as weld size characteristics, can be evaluated.

Before checking for surface flaws, welds must be cleaned of slag. Shotblasting should not be done before examination, because the peening action may seal fine cracks and make them invisible. The AWS D1.1 Structural Welding Code, for example, does not allow peening "on the root or surface layer of the weld or the base metal at the edges of the weld."

Visual inspection can only locate defects in the weld surface. Specifications or applicable codes may require that the internal portion of the weld and adjoining metal zones also be examined. Nondestructive examinations may be used to determine the presence of a flaw, but they cannot measure its influence on the serviceability of the product unless they are based on a correlation between the flaw and some characteristic that affects service. Otherwise, destructive tests are the only sure way to determine weld serviceability.

Radiographic Inspection
Radiography (X-ray) is one of the most important, versatile and widely accepted of all the nondestructive examination methods - Fig. 1. X-ray is used to determine internal soundness of the welds. The term "X-ray quality," widely used to indicate high quality in welds, arises from this inspection method

Radiography is based on the ability of X-rays and gamma rays to pass through metal and other materials opaque to ordinary light, and produce photographic records of the transmitted radiant energy. All materials will absorb known amounts of this radiant energy and, therefore, X-rays and gamma rays can be used to show discontinuities and inclusions within the opaque material. The permanent film record of the internal conditions will show the basic information by which weld soundness and be determined.

X-rays are produced by high-voltage generators. As the high voltage applied to an X-ray tube is increased, the wavelength of the emitted X-ray becomes shorter , providing more penetrating power. Gamma rays are produced by the atomic disintegration of radioisotopes. The radioactive isotopes most widely used in industrial radiography are Cobalt 60 and Iridium 192. Gamma rays emitted from these isotopes are similar to X-rays, except their wavelengths are usually shorter. This allows them to penetrate to greater depths than X-rays of the same power, however, exposure times are considerably longer due to the longer intensity.

When X-rays or gamma rays are directed at a section of weldment , not all of the radiation passes are through the metal. Different materials, depending on their density, thickness and atomic number, will absorb different wavelengths of radiant energy.

The degree to which the different materials absorb these rays determines the intensity of the rays penetrating through the material. When variations of these rays are recorded, a means of seeing inside the material is available. The image on a developed photo-sensitized film is known as a radiograph. Thicker areas of the specimen or higher density material (tungsten inclusion), will absorb more radiation and their corresponding areas on the radiograph will be lighter - Fig 2.

Whether in the shop or in the field, the reliability and interpretive value of radiographic images are a function of their sharpness and contrast. The ability of an observer to detect a flaw depends on the sharpness of its image and its contrast with the background. To be sure that a radiographic exposure produces acceptable results, a gauge known as an Image Quality Indicator (IQI) is placed on the part so that its image will be produced on the radiograph.

IQI's used to determine radiographic quality are also called penetrameters. A standard hole-type penetrameter is a rectangular piece of metal with three drilled holes of set diameters. The thickness of the piece of metal is a percentage of the thickness of the specimen being radiographed. The diameter of each hole is different and is a given multiple of the penetrameter thickness. Wire-type penetrameters are also widely used, especially outside the United States. They consist of several pieces of wire, each of a different diameter. Sensitivity is determined by the smallest diameter of wire that can be clearly seen on the radiograph.

A penetrameter is not an indicator or gauge to measure the size of a discontinuity or the minimum detectable flaw size. It is an indicator of the quality of the radiographic technique.

Radiographic images are not always easy to interpret. Film handling marks and streaks, fog and spots caused by developing errors may make it difficult to identify defects. Such film artifacts may mask weld discontinuities.

Surface defects will show up on the film and must be recognized. Because the angle of exposure will also influence the radiograph, it is difficult or impossible to analyze fillet welds by this method. Because a radiograph compresses all the defects that occur throughout the thickness of the weld into one plane, it tends to give an exaggerated impression of scattered type defects such as porosity or inclusions.

An X-ray image of the interior of the weld may be viewed on a fluorescent screen, as well as on developed film. This makes it possible to inspect parts faster and at a lower cost, but the image definition is poorer. Computerization has made it possible to overcome many of the shortcomings of radiographic imaging by linking the fluorescent screen with a video camera. Instead of waiting for film to be developed, the images can be viewed in real time. This can improve quality and reduce costs on production applications such as pipe welding, where a problem can be identified and corrected quickly.

By digitizing the image and loading it into a computer, the image can be enhanced and analyzed to a degree never before possible. Multiple images can be superimposed. Pixel values can be adjusted to change shading and contrast, bringing out small flaws and discontinuities that would not show up on film. Colors can be assigned to the various shades of gray to further enhance the image and make flaws stand out better. The process of digitizing an image taken from the fluorescent screen - having that image computer enhanced and transferred to a viewing monitor - takes only a few seconds. However, because there is a time delay, we can no longer consider this "real time." It is called "radioscopy imagery."

Existing films can be digitized to achieve the same results and improve the analysis process. Another advantage is the ability to archive images on laser optical disks, which take up far less space than vaults of old films and are much easier to recall when needed.

Industrial radiography, then, is an inspection method using X-rays and gamma rays as a penetrating medium, and densitized film as a recording medium, to obtain a photographic record of internal quality. Generally, defects in welds consist either of a void in the weld metal itself or an inclusion that differs in density from the surrounding weld metal.

Radiographic equipment produces radiation that can be harmful to body tissue in excessive amounts, so all safety precautions should be followed closely. All instructions should be followed carefully to achieve satisfactory results. Only personnel who are trained in radiation safety and qualified as industrial radiographers should be permitted to do radiographic testing.
Magnetic Particle Inspection (MT)
Magnetic particle inspection is a method of locating and defining discontinuities in magnetic materials. It is excellent for detecting surface defects in welds, including discontinuities that are too small to be seen with the naked eye, and those that are slightly subsurface.

This method may be used to inspect plate edges prior to welding, in process inspection of each weld pass or layer, postweld evaluation and to inspect repairs - Fig. 3.

It is a good method for detecting surface cracks of all sizes in both the weld and adjacent base metal, subsurface cracks, incomplete fusion, undercut and inadequate penetration in the weld, as well as defects on the repaired edges of the base metal. Although magnetic particle testing should not be a substitute for radiography or ultrasonics for subsurface evaluations, it may present an advantage over their methods in detecting tight cracks and surface discontinuities.

With this method, probes are usually placed on each side of the area to be inspected, and a high amperage is passed through the workplace between them. A magnetic flux is produced at right angles to the flow of current - Fig. 3. When these lines of force encounter a discontinuity, such as a longitudinal crack, they are diverted and leak through the surface, creating magnetic poles or points of attraction. A magnetic powder dusted onto the surface will cling to the leakage area more tenaciously than elsewhere, forming an indication of the discontinuity.

For this indication to develop, the discontinuity must be angled against the magnetic lines of force. Thus, when current is passed longitudinally through a workpiece, only longitudinal flaws will show. Putting the workpiece inside a solenoid coil will create longitudinal lines of force (Fig. 3) that cause transverse and angular cracks to become visible when the magnetic powder is applied.

Although much simpler to use than radiographic inspection, the magnetic particle method is limited to use with ferromagnetic materials and cannot be used with austenitic steels. A joint between a base metal and a weld of different magnetic characteristics will create magnetic discontinuities that may falsely be interpreted as unsound. On the other hand, a true defect can be obscured by the powder clinging over the harmless magnetic discontinuity. Sensitivity decreases with the size of the defect and is also less with round cracks such as gas pockets. It is best with elongated forms, such as cracks, and is limited to surface flaws and some subsurface flaws, mostly on thinner materials.

Because the field must be distorted sufficiently to create the external leakage required to identify flaws, the fine, elongated discontinuities, such as hairline cracks, seams or inclusions that are parallel to the magnetic field, will not show up. They can be developed by changing the direction of the field, and it is advisable to apply the field from two directions, preferably at right angles to each other.

Magnetic powders maybe applied dry or wet. The dry powder method is popular for inspecting heavy weldments, while the wet method is often used in inspecting aircraft components. Dry powder is dusted uniformly over the work with a spray gun, dusting bag or atomizer. The finely divided magnetic particles are coated to increase their mobility and are available in gray, black and red colors to improve visibility. In the wet method, very fine red or black particles are suspended in water or light petroleum distillate. This can be flowed or sprayed on, or the part may be dipped into the liquid. The wet method is more sensitive than the dry method, because it allows the use of finer particles that can detect exceedingly fine defects. Fluorescent powders may be used for further sensitivity and are especially useful for locating discontinuities in corners, keyways, splines and deep holes.

Liquid Penetrant Inspection (PT)
Surface cracks and pinholes that are not visible to the naked eye can be located by the liquid penetrant inspection. It is widely used to locate leaks in welds and can be applied with austentic steels and nonferrous materials where magnetic particle inspection would be useless.

Liquid penetrant inspection is often referred to as an extension of the visual inspection method. Many standards, such as the AWS D.1. Code, say that "welds subject to liquid penetrant testing·shall be evaluated on the basis of the requirements for visual inspection."

Two types of penetrating liquids are used - fluorescent and visible dye. With fluorescent penetrant inspection, a highly fluorescent liquid with good penetrating qualities is applied to the surface of the part to be examined. Capillary action draws the liquid into the surface openings, and the excess is then removed. A "developer" is used to draw the penetrant to the surface, and the resulting indication is viewed by ultraviolet (black) light. The high contrast between the fluorescent material and the object makes it possible to detect minute traces of penetrant that indicate surface defects.

Dye penetrant inspection is similar, except that vividly colored dyes visible under ordinary light are used - Fig. 4. Normally, a white developer is used with the dye penetrants that creates a sharply contrasting background to the vivid dye color. This allows greater portability by eliminating the need for ultraviolet light.

The part to be inspected must be clean and dry, because any foreign matter could close the cracks or pinholes and exclude the penetrant. Penetrants can be applied by dipping, spraying or brushing, but sufficient time must be allowed for the liquid to be fully absorbed into the discontinuities. This may take an hour or more in very exacting work.

Liquid penetrant inspection is widely used for leak detection. A common procedure is to apply fluorescent material to one side of a joint, wait an adequate time for capillary action to take place, and then view the other side with ultraviolet light. In thin-walled vessels, this technique will identify leaks that ordinarily would not be located by the usual air test with pressures of 5-20 lb/in.2 When wall thickness exceeds ¹ in., however, sensitivity of the leak test decreases.

Ultrasonic Inspection (UT)
Ultrasonic inspection is a method of detecting discontinuities by directing a high-frequency sound beam through the base plate and weld on a predictable path. When the sound beam's plate path strikes an interruption in the material continuity, some of the sound is reflected back. The sound is collected by the instrument, amplified and displayed as a vertical trance on a video screen - Fig. 5.

Both surface and subsurface detects in metals can be detected, located and measured by ultrasonic inspection, including flaws too small to be detected by other methods.

The ultrasonic unit contains a crystal of quartz or other piezoelectric material encapsulated in a transducer or probe. When a voltage is applied, the crystal vibrates rapidly. As an ultrasonic transducer is held against the metal to be inspected, it imparts mechanical vibrations of the same frequency as the crystal through a couplet material into the base metal and weld. These vibrational waves are propagated through the material until they reach a discontinuity or change in density. At these points, some of the vibrational energy is reflected back. As the current that causes the vibration is shut off and on at 60-1000 times per second, the quartz crystal intermittently acts as a receiver to pick up the reflected vibrations. These cause pressure on the crystal and generate an electrical current. Fed to a video screen, this current produces vertical deflections on the horizontal base line. The resulting pattern on the face of the tube represents the reflected signal and the discontinuity. Compact portable ultrasonic equipment is available for field inspection and is commonly used on bridge and structural work.

Ultrasonic testing is less suitable than other NDE methods for determining porosity in welds, because round gas pores respond to ultrasonic tests as a series of single point reflectors. This results in low-amplitude responses that are easily confused with "base-line noise" inherent with testing parameters. However, it is the preferred test method for detecting plainer-type discontinuities and lamination.

Portable ultrasonic equipment is available with digital operation and microprocessor controls. These instruments may have built-in memory and can provide hard-copy printouts or video monitoring and recording. They can be interfaced with computers, which allows further analysis, documentation and archiving, much as with radiographic data. Ultrasonic examination requires expert interpretation from highly skilled and extensively trained personnel.

Choices Control Quality
A good NDE inspection program must recognize the inherent limitations of each process. For example, both radiography and ultrasound have distinct orientation factors that may guide the choice of which process to use for a particular job. Their strengths and weaknesses tend to compliment each other. While radiography is unable to reliably detect lamination-like defects, ultrasound is much better at it. On the other hand, ultrasound is poorly suited to detecting scattered porosity, while radiography is very good.

Whatever inspection techniques are used, paying attention to the "Five P's" of weld quality will help reduce subsequent inspection to a routine checking activity. Then, the proper use of NDE methods will serve as a check to keep variables in line and weld quality within standards.

The Five P's are:
1) Process Selection. The process must be right for the job.
2) Preparation. The joint configuration must be right and compatible with the welding process.
3) Procedures. The procedures must be spelled out in detail and followed religiously during welding.
4) Pretesting. Full-scale mockups or simulated specimens should be used to prove that the process and procedures give the desired standard of quality.
5) Personnel. Qualified people must be assigned to the job.

» Read More...